Elementary school students’  attitudes towards comparison as a  method of teaching geography

Milka Grmuša; Snježana Musa; Milica Drobac Pavićević

doi:10.7251/SIN2201001G

Milka Grmuša University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Philosophy Pale, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Snježana Musa University of Mostar, Faculty of Science and Education, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Milica Drobac Pavićević University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Philosophy, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7251/SIN2201001G

Keywords: comparison, teaching geography, elementary school, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The importance of comparison in geography education is undoubtedly immense. Comparison as a process of thinking represents the oldest method for deriving geographical evidence and it is often used in teaching geography. It can be argued that this method is the most characteristic method for geography as a school subject. In addition to the development of the students’ ability to analyze, synthetize, generalize, and distinguish between the relevant and the irrelevant, this method can also contribute to the development of critical thinking, problem-solving and facilitate conclusion-reaching. With respect to the importance of comparison in geography education, the aim of the research in this paper was set: to determine the attitudes of elementary school students towards comparison as a method of teaching. The attitudes of the students towards comparison in teaching geography and the acquisition of geographical knowledge, as well as in the increase of the students’ interest, motivation and activation in the process were examined. It was also investigated whether there is a difference in students’ attitudes towards the method of comparison in relation to gender, Geography grade and the grade they attend.
The surveying method was used. The results of the research show that the students expressed mostly positive attitudes towards the use of the comparison method in teaching geography. The results
are also indicative of the importance of a geographical map in the application of the comparison method.

References

Dean, C. B., Hubbell, E. R., Pitler, H., & Stone, B. J. (2012). Classroom Instruction That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. ASCD.

Dorn, W., & Jahn, W. (1973). Formiranje predodžbi i pojmova u nastavi geografije. Školska knjiga.

Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5(3), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00652.x

Grmuša, M., Šušnjar, S., Golijanin, J., & Lukić Tanović, M. (2017). Strategija pronalaženja sličnosti i razlika u funkciji razvoja aktivne nastave geografije. U Zbornik radova IV Kongresa geografa Bosne i Hercegovine (pp. 97-110). Geografsko društvo u Federaciji BiH.

Grmuša, M. (2018). Kognitivno područje Blumove taksonomije i nastava geografije. Herald, 22, 117‒140. https://doi.org/10.7251/HER2218117G

Hadžić-Krnetić, A., Drobac, M., Zečević, I., & Mikanović, B. (2014). Primjena Blumove taksonomije u analizi ishoda obrazovanja za osnovnu školu. U S. Stojiljković, Z. Marković & G. Đigić (Eds.). Dani primenjene psihologije: Individualne razlike, obrazovanje i rad – tematski zbornik radova (pp. 93-103). Filozofski fakultet Niš.

International Charter on Geographical Education. (2016). https://www.igu-cge.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/IGU_2016_eng_ver25Feb2019.pdf

JASP Team (2019). JASP (version 0.10.2) Computer software. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/

Laketa, N., & Vasilijević, D. (2006). Osnove didaktike. Učiteljski fakultet Užice.

Markman, A. B ., & Gentner, D. (1993a). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), 517-535. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1027

Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993b). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 431-467. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1011

Mastilo, N. (1984). Upoređivanje u nastavi geografije. U Prilozi didaktici i metodici nastave geografije (pp. 175-183). Svjetlost.

Marzano, J.R., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J.E. (2006). Nastavne strategije: kako primijeniti devet najuspješnijih nastavnih strategija. Educa.

Marzano, J.R. (2007). TThe Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction. ASCD.

Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Markman, A. B. (1995). Comparison and choice: Relations between similarity processing and decision processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214410

Silver, F.H., Dewing. R. T., & Perini, M.J. (2012). The Core Six: Essential Strategies for Achieving Excellence with the Common Core. ASCD.

Simon, М., & Budke, А. (2020). How Geography Textbook Tasks Promote Comparison Competency-An International Analysis. Sustainability, 12(20), 1-19, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208344

Simon, М., Budke, А., & Schäbitz, F. (2020). The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis. Heliyon, 6(8), e04420.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04420

Stojaković, P. (1985). Psihološki problemi instrukcije i učenja u nastavi. Svjetlost.

Todorović, D. (2008). Metodologija psiholoških istraživanja. Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.

Wilcke, H., & Budke, A. (2019). Comparison as a Method for Geography Education. Education Sciences, 9(3):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030225

Zečević, I., Mikanović, B., Hadžić, A., & Drobac, M. (2014). Znanja i vještine u nastavnim programima za mlađi školski uzrast. Inovacije u nastavi - časopis za savremenu nastavu , 27(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1402084Z